Exception Safety
Exception safety refers to the guarantees that code provides in the presence of exceptions, ensuring that the program remains in a valid state even when an exception is thrown. The goal is to handle exceptions in such a way that resources are properly managed, and the program's state remains consistent.
There are different levels of exception safety guarantees that C++ code can provide, and understanding these levels helps in writing robust and reliable software.
1. Levels of Exception Safety
No-throw Guarantee (Strongest Guarantee)
- Definition: Functions that provide this guarantee will never throw an exception. If a function is marked noexcept or documented to never throw, it provides the no-throw guarantee.
- Use Case: This guarantee is crucial for functions like destructors, which should not throw exceptions because throwing an exception in a destructor during stack unwinding can lead to program termination.
- Example:
voidno_throw_function()noexcept{
// Code that does not throw any exceptions
}
Strong Exception Guarantee
- Definition: Functions providing this guarantee ensure that if an exception is thrown, the state of the program remains unchanged, as if the function had never been called.
- Use Case: This is important for operations like copy constructors or assignment operators, where you want to ensure that either the operation completes successfully or the program remains in its original state.
- Example:
std::string safe_concat(const std::string& s1, const std::string& s2){
std::string result = s1; // Copy s1
result += s2; // This operation might throwreturn result;
}
- If operator+= on std::string throws, safe_concat leaves s1 unchanged.
Basic Exception Guarantee
- Definition: Functions that provide this guarantee ensure that even if an exception is thrown, the program remains in a valid, but potentially altered, state. No resources are leaked, and the program does not crash.
- Use Case: This is the most common guarantee and is expected in well-written code where complete rollbacks are not necessary.
- Example:
voidbasic_exception_function(std::vector<int>& v){
v.push_back(42); // If this throws, v is still in a valid state
}
- Even if push_back throws, v remains valid, though its content might have changed.
No Exception Safety (Weakest Guarantee)
- Definition: Code that does not provide any specific guarantees about what happens if an exception is thrown. The program might end up in an invalid state, leak resources, or crash.
- Use Case: This level of guarantee is generally avoided in production code, but might be found in quick-and-dirty code or legacy systems.
2. Techniques for Ensuring Exception Safety
Resource Acquisition Is Initialization (RAII)
- Concept: Manage resources such as memory, file handles, and locks using objects whose constructors acquire the resource and whose destructors release it. This ensures that resources are automatically released when an exception is thrown.
- Example:
classFile {
public:
File(const std::string& filename) : file_handle(std::fopen(filename.c_str(), "r")) {
if (!file_handle) throw std::runtime_error("Failed to open file");
}
~File() {
if (file_handle) std::fclose(file_handle);
}
private:
FILE* file_handle;
};
Copy-and-Swap Idiom
- Concept: Implement the assignment operator using a copy-and-swap strategy to ensure the strong exception guarantee. This involves creating a copy of the object, performing operations on the copy, and then swapping the copy with the current object.
- Example:
classMyClass {
public:
MyClass& operator=(MyClass other) {
swap(*this, other);
return *this;
}
private:
voidswap(MyClass& first, MyClass& second){
std::swap(first.data, second.data);
}
int* data;
};
Use noexcept Where Appropriate
- Concept: Mark functions with noexcept when they are not expected to throw exceptions. This not only provides the no-throw guarantee but can also lead to optimizations.
- Example:
voidsafe_function()noexcept{
// This function is guaranteed not to throw
}
Handle Exceptions in Destructors Carefully
- Concept: Destructors should generally avoid throwing exceptions because they are often called during stack unwinding. If a destructor must handle an error, it should catch any exceptions and either log the error or perform another form of non-throwing error handling.
- Example:
classMyClass {
public:
~MyClass() {
try {
// Code that might throw
} catch (...) {
// Handle the exception, but do not throw
}
}
};
Transactional Semantics
- Concept: Design functions to perform all operations in a "transactional" manner, where either the entire operation completes successfully, or no partial changes are made.
- Example:
voidupdateDatabase(Database& db){
db.startTransaction(); // Begin transactiontry {
db.update("key", "value"); // This might throw
db.commitTransaction(); // Commit changes
} catch (...) {
db.rollbackTransaction(); // Rollback changes if an exception is thrownthrow; // Re-throw the exception
}
}
Use Smart Pointers
- Concept: Smart pointers like std::unique_ptr and std::shared_ptr automatically manage memory and help prevent memory leaks in the presence of exceptions.
- Example:
voidsafeFunction(){
std::unique_ptr<int> ptr(newint(10));
// If an exception is thrown here, the memory is automatically released
}
Avoid Exceptions in Constructors
- Concept: If possible, avoid complex operations in constructors that might throw exceptions. Instead, use factory functions or two-phase initialization to manage the creation of objects.
- Example:
classMyClass {
private:
MyClass() { /* Complex operations here */ }
public:
static std::unique_ptr<MyClass> create(){
std::unique_ptr<MyClass> instance(new MyClass());
// Additional setup that might throwreturn instance;
}
};
Conclusion
Exception safety is a critical aspect of writing robust C++ code. By understanding the different levels of exception safety and employing techniques such as RAII, the copy-and-swap idiom, and careful management of resources, you can ensure that your code remains consistent and safe even in the face of exceptions. This leads to software that is more reliable, easier to maintain, and less prone to catastrophic failures.